|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
|
Will my complaint be made public?
Yes. If your complaint results in discipline or formal charges in the Virgin Islands Supreme Court, your name and the judge's name and court will be made public. If the complaint is dismissed, however, your name and the judge's name and court will not be made public.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
When do proceedings become public?
The Rules specifically make all ethical complaints against judges confidential. Confidentiality ends only when the CJC files with the Supreme Court a recommendation for sanction. This is a public record and is the first public announcement that a formal investigation is underway.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
|
How do investigations begin?
The CJC can investigate complaints made by individuals. During the initial investigation, the Commission’s Rules provide that all CJC complaints, investigations, and proceedings are confidential.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
What is involuntary retirement?
The CJC can recommend that a judge be involuntarily retired due to serious illness that interferes with the ability to perform the duties of the office. In these cases, the judge is not being accused of misconduct. Filings in these cases may be confidential under local laws protecting medical records of employees.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
Who is on the CJC?
The Commission consists of nine members with diverse backgrounds who serve four-year terms. Three judge members are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, one of whom is a magistrate. Three attorney members are appointed: one by President of the Virgin Islands Bar Association, one by the Governor and one by the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. Three public members, who cannot be attorneys or active or retired judges, are appointed: one by the Governor and two by the President of the Virgin Islands Legislature.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
How does the CJC hold proceedings?
The hearing panel of CJC will review the case against the judge and hear competing arguments from both sides. The amount of time involved in conducting hearings varies greatly from case to case. Some judges agree or "stipulate" to some form of discipline, which means there will be no further proceedings and the case will go on to the Supreme Court for final determination. However, the Supreme Court can reject these stipulations. If a judge contests the charges, more time and more hearings usually are involved. The CJC hearing panel schedules its own hearings.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
How is the CJC structured?
The CJC is divided into two panels, an "investigative panel" that acts much like a grand jury, and a "hearing panel" that acts much like a panel of judges reviewing the case.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
When does the case come to the Supreme Court?
Once the CJC panel has concluded its hearings, it files its findings and recommendation for any discipline with the Supreme Court. If the judge has stipulated to discipline, the stipulation also will be filed with the Court. The Supreme Court then must decide whether to schedule oral argument. Briefs can be filed with the Court before it decides the case. If oral argument is scheduled, it is announced in advance and published on the Court's website.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
• |
|
Why doesn't the Supreme Court impose discipline as soon as the CJC makes its recommendation?
The CJC only has authority to impose minor sanctions such as reprimands and must recommend more serious discipline to the Supreme Court. This is only a recommendation, not a final determination. Final authority to determine whether the CJC's recommendation is legally correct rests with the Supreme Court after the parties have had a chance to make arguments according to the Rules of Procedure. This means that the parties have a right to file briefs making separate arguments to the Supreme Court unless the judge waives that right, to file appropriate motions, and to request that the Court schedule the case for oral arguments.
[Top of page]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|